Skip to content

Int. development office — night

The pile is bigger than the week. So the pile decides what gets read, and the reading decides what gets made.

Days

Turnaround on a single evaluation, when a human reader has a queue.

Inconsistent

Two readers, two rubrics, two verdicts on the same script — and no way to reconcile them.

Unread

The submissions nobody got to. The reason they were passed on is that nobody opened them.

Scripitt is the intelligence layer underneath that problem. It does not replace the person who decides. It makes sure that person is deciding on a complete, consistent read of everything in front of them.

Decision architecture

One read. Four connected layers.

Depth when you need to understand. Compression when you need to decide.

  1. 01

    Analysis

    What does the evidence say?

    The full Story Intelligence Report — deep analysis, scoring, development, alignment, market, adaptation and risk intelligence, with citations back to the page. For the people who need the evidence.

    See the evidence →
  2. 02

    Recommendation

    What does Scripitt conclude?

    The Executive Decision Brief — the recommendation, rationale, confidence, critical opportunity, material risk, alignment, next action and decision-changing factors, derived from the same record. For the person who has to make the call.

    Make the call →
  3. 03

    Human decision

    What did the organization actually decide?

    The Company Decision — Recommend, Consider or Pass, by whom, on which draft, when, and why — recorded as its own state, separate from and above the machine recommendation.

  4. 04

    Memory

    What should the organization retain?

    The library keeps the analysis, the recommendation, the human decision, the material history and every revision connected to one intelligence record, so the organization learns from its own reads over time.

Five capabilities

  1. 01Read & Understand
  2. 02Evaluate & Score
  3. 03Route & Compare
  4. 04Remember & Organize
  5. 05Operationalize Insights

Modes

Eleven modes, eleven kinds of read

A pilot is not a feature, a pitch is not a pilot, and a manuscript is none of them. Each mode carries its own rubric, its own sections and its own idea of what “working” means, and the mode is detected on the way in.

01

Feature Script

Full coverage on a feature screenplay — logline, synopsis, craft breakdown, market read and a Pass / Consider / Recommend verdict.

02

TV Pilot

Pilot-specific analysis: engine, series-ability, character runway, episodic vs. serialized fit, and where the season two problem lives.

03

Book & Manuscript Review

Long-form editorial coverage for publishers and literary teams — structure, voice, market position and comparable titles.

04

Quick Book Triage

A fast first-pass read for a full submission pile. Sort the stack before anyone spends a weekend on it.

05

Book-to-Screen Adaptation

Adaptation feasibility: what survives the translation, what has to be invented, budget shape and the format the material actually wants.

06

Publishing Readiness

Submission-grade assessment of whether a manuscript is ready to go out, and precisely what is holding it back.

07

Micro-Drama & Vertical Series

Built for the vertical short-form format on its own terms: hook velocity, per-episode cliff placement, retention across an episode arc, and whether the premise sustains a full season at that length.

08

Topical Coverage

Analyzes time-sensitive material against current web sources to identify relevant developments, missed topical opportunities, and story context, with citations provided for human review. The only mode that researches the live web; the other ten read the submitted material alone.

09

Pitch Document

Scored as a pitch, not a script: premise and hook, audience and positioning, character and world, stakes and dramatic engine, series or film potential, and how persuasively it reads. Never marked down for missing sluglines, dialogue or act breaks.

10

Series Treatment

Evaluates a season on the page: protagonist and ensemble arcs, the episodic and season engine, progression and stakes, tone and theme. Screenplay structure and formatting are not evaluated and never deducted.

11

Film Treatment

Reads a feature as prose: the protagonist's arc, conflict and stakes, beginning-middle-end progression and cinematic potential, on its own 100-point rubric rather than a screenplay's.

Inside the platform

Evaluation is the output. The judgment around it is the product.

Evaluation Lens

Patent pending

Coverage is never generic. Choose the lane, the buyer and the creative sensibility the material is being judged against, and the read changes accordingly.

Trainable taste

Patent pending

Calibrate a lens from the scripts an executive actually loved, or simply describe the taste in a few sentences. The system learns that sensibility and applies it consistently across the pile — and it cannot be instructed to force a verdict.

Alignment Radar

Patent pending

Names the lanes the material fits, the buyers most likely to respond and the kindred voices it sits beside — each with a fit score, not a vibe.

What-If Simulator

Patent pending

Re-score the material under an as-executed assumption. Separates what is wrong on the page from what is merely unproven.

Decision Brief

Patent pending

A decision-grade executive layer derived from the full Story Intelligence analysis. It preserves the recommendation, rationale, confidence, critical opportunity, material risk, alignment, next action and decision-changing factors — while the complete supporting analysis remains available underneath. Shareable by link, exportable to DOCX, carrying your letterhead.

Company Decision

Patent pending

The AI recommends; the organization decides — and the platform records which is which. A verdict, who made it, when and why is logged against the project and travels with the brief and the library register, so the human call is never confused with the machine's.

Side-by-side

Put two or three projects against each other and get a head-of-development recommendation with the reasoning shown.

Ask the library

Patent pending

Every report is indexed. Ask your own catalog a question in plain language and get answers with the coverage cited.

Provenance Ledger

Patent pending

Each submission is fingerprinted at intake and written to an append-only chronology, with the coverage number bound to that exact revision. A Creator Provenance Report can be exported for any work, stating what is known and naming what is not.

White-label

Patent pending

Enterprise workspaces carry your logo, your colors and your letterhead across the workspace, every shared report and brief, the preview card a recipient sees, and the DOCX export. Brand identity is imported from your website in one step. Nothing on an outward surface says Scripitt unless you want it to; every white-labelled surface carries a discreet Powered by HAAIS mark.

Library registers

Export or print a register of the desk, the cloud library or server activity — material and coverage numbers, recommendation, the recorded company decision, what was shared and when. Metadata only; the text never leaves.

What is actually running

An engine, not a chatbot.

Scripitt is a story-intelligence system. A language model is one component inside it, called at defined steps to read and assess. Everything around those steps is Scripitt's own engineering, and none of it can be talked into a different answer.

Change the model and the platform keeps working. Remove the platform and the model is just a prompt.

Intake and structure

Eight formats, scanned pages, size-aware routing and a complete comprehension pass that structures the whole work before any judgment is formed.

Orchestration

Mode-specific specialist reads run in parallel against the lens you chose, then a reconciliation step resolves their disagreements instead of averaging them away.

Validation

Every output passes a bounded validation ladder that rejects, repairs and re-checks weak work. A report that cannot clear it says so rather than inventing confidence.

Scoring and verdict

Weighted scorecards, strategic scores and the Pass / Consider / Recommend verdict are computed by the system from the evidence, not improvised in prose.

Memory and provenance

Fingerprints, an append-only chronology, same-text detection, revision-aware scoring and coverage numbers bound to the exact draft.

The human layer

The company decision is recorded as its own state, above the machine recommendation, with who, when, which draft and why.

Where we stand

The machine reads.
You decide.

This is not a rhetorical position. It is how the system is built, and it is the reason a writer can hand us a draft without hesitating.

The machine never writes

Scripitt does not generate, rewrite or punch up creative material. Not a line. It reads, it assesses, it cites. Authorship stays entirely with the writer.

The decision stays human

Every output is an input to a person's judgment. The verdict is a recommendation with its reasoning exposed, so a reader can disagree with it on the evidence.

Nothing is asserted without the page

Claims trace back to the material. If the read cannot support a judgment, the report says so rather than inventing confidence.

Built for

Production companies

Clear the pile without losing the good one at the bottom of it.

Managers & agencies

Read every client submission properly, at the speed clients expect.

Publishers

Triage the slush, then go deep on what survives.

Contests & labs

Consistent, defensible scoring across thousands of entries.

Vertical & micro-drama

Volume formats need volume reading. This is what it was built for.

ScripittScripitt

Pilots are open.

We are taking on a small number of production companies, agencies and publishers to run Scripitt against a live slate. Tell us what you read and how much of it, and we will come back with a scope.